Marine and Ports Reporting for Vessel, Berth, and Cargo Operations

All three, on one page, with the definitions published. Trying to force a single turnaround figure usually fails because the three parties are genuinely measuring different things — alongside time, working time, and billable time. Showing them together with the gaps labelled turns a recurring argument into a visible, explainable difference.

Yes, and it is one of the more valuable splits. Weather and tide data joined to the delay log lets weather-driven delay be excluded from operational performance while remaining visible for capacity planning and for contractual discussions where weather is an excluded event.

Where exports are available, which is usually the case. Most terminal operating systems can produce scheduled extracts of vessel, berth, and cargo movements, and that is sufficient for the first sprint. Direct integration is scoped later and is never a prerequisite.

Yes. Multi-berth and multi-site reporting is common, and the comparability work is where the value concentrates — provided delay codes and cargo classifications are consistent across sites. Where they are not, agreeing a common taxonomy is part of the first sprint rather than something to be deferred.

Role-based access, scoped during the build. Operational staff generally see throughput and delay without customer commercial terms; commercial staff see the customer view. This is the same approach used wherever one dataset serves audiences with different entitlements.

One to two weeks for a single view such as turnaround or berth utilisation. Three to six weeks for the full weekly pack. The variable is usually how consistently delay causes are coded today.