Energy and Utilities Reporting for Network, Outage, and Compliance Teams
Asset condition, outage and interruption performance, works programme delivery, and regulatory reporting brought into one weekly operating view.
- Interruption and reliability metrics calculated once, consistently
- Works programme progress against the regulatory commitment
- Field crew productivity separated from travel and access delays
Weekly pack
Network weekly pack
Reporting areas
What energy and utilities teams report on first
Each one starts as a single trusted number with a named owner, then earns its place in the weekly review.
Reliability and interruption performance
Interruption frequency and duration by feeder, region, and cause, calculated on one agreed definition so the regulatory number and the operational number match.
Works programme delivery
Planned versus delivered against the capital and maintenance programme, with slippage attributed to access, resourcing, or design rather than left as a percentage.
Asset condition and defects
Inspection findings and defect backlog by asset class and risk rating, so remediation is prioritised on condition rather than on age alone.
Field crew productivity
Productive time against travel, access wait, and rework, which is where the difference between crews usually turns out to be explainable.
Outage and switching coordination
Planned outage windows, approvals, and clash detection across the programme so two jobs do not need the same isolation.
Regulatory and compliance reporting
The recurring statutory submissions built from the same data as the operational pack, so internal and external numbers cannot drift apart.
Systems we pull from
Built from the systems already in the control room
We build on what you already own. No new platform to buy, and each system stays the record of truth for its own work.
Send us your report pack →FAQ support
Frequently asked questions
Clear answers on timeline, investment, and delivery scope.
Our regulatory numbers and our operational numbers never match. Can reporting fix that?
The reporting cannot fix it on its own, but it is designed to expose why. Usually the two are calculated from different extracts with different exclusion rules — momentary interruptions, planned versus unplanned, excluded events. The definition workshop settles which rules apply, and both figures are then derived from one model so a divergence becomes visible immediately rather than at submission.
Do you connect directly to SCADA or the outage system?
Not usually to start. Event log exports and works management extracts are enough for the first sprint, and reporting is read-only by nature. A direct connection is scoped later if the manual export step is the remaining friction. Nothing we build writes to or interacts with an operational control system.
Can you report at feeder or asset level, not just network level?
Yes, and it is generally where the value is. Network-level reliability figures are what the regulator sees, but feeder and asset-level performance is what tells you where to spend. The constraint is that asset identifiers need to be consistent between the outage system and the asset register — where they are not, building that mapping is part of the sprint.
How do you handle field crew productivity without it becoming surveillance?
By reporting at crew and job-type level rather than individual level, and by always separating productive time from access wait, travel, and rework. Reporting that reads as individual monitoring produces defensive data entry, and the numbers stop being useful within a month. The useful question is which job types lose time and why, not who was slow.
Can this cover both electricity and water or gas networks?
Yes. The reporting pattern — asset condition, programme delivery, interruption performance, crew productivity, compliance — is common across network utilities. The metric definitions and regulatory obligations differ, which is handled in the definition stage rather than by a different build.
How long before the first useful view is running?
One to two weeks for a single view such as programme delivery or defect backlog. Three to six weeks for the full weekly pack. Regulatory reporting integration usually extends past that, because agreeing the exclusion rules takes longer than building the report.
Related sectors
Where to go next
Send the current works programme report.
The Reporting Friction Audit starts from the pack your works or network team produces today and returns a friction map plus a 30-day fix path.
Book the Reporting Friction Audit →